SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3193

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Nirmala Khatri – Appellant
Versus
Tarannum Jahan – Respondent


Advocates:
Vipin Mishra,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B. P. SHARMA

th

ON THE 9 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 42388 of 2024 NIRMALA KHATRI Versus TARANNUM JAHAN Appearance:

Shri Vipin Mishra, counsel for the applicant.

Ms. Ashi Soni and Shri Akshay Jha, counsel for respondent.

ORDER This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant/accused challenging the order dated 05.09.2024 passed by the learned XXIVth Add. Session Judge, Jabalpur in Cr. Rev no. 264/24, arising out of the order dated 20.05.2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Jabalpur in SCNIA No. 291/2020, whereby the application filed by the applicant under Section 45 of the Evidence Act for sending the disputed cheque for handwriting expert opinion has been rejected.

2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent/complainant had filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act alleging dishonour of cheque of Rs.2,00,000/-. The applicant denied issuance of the cheque and claimed that the signature appearing on the cheque is forged.

3. During trial, the applicant initially filed an application under Section

45 of the Evidence Act

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top