SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3201

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Ganesh Dutta Paraha – Appellant
Versus
Shri Radha Krishnaji Maharaj (The Deity) – Respondent


Advocates:
Subhash Chandra Gupta,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 6 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. PETITION No. 951 of 2019 GANESH DUTTA PARAHA AND OTHERS Versus SHRI RADHA KRISHNAJI MAHARAJ (THE DEITY) AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri D.K. Dixit - Senior Advocate with Shri Anshul Dixit - Advocate for the petitioner No.1 & 2.

Shri Avnish Khatri - P.L. for the respondents / State.

Shri S.S. Rathore - Advocate for respondent.

ORDER The present petition has been filed challenging the order Annexure P-

9 passed by the trial Court dated 22.01.2019 whereby the trial Court has rejected application for transposition of defendant No.1 as plaintiff No.4. The application was filed by the other defendants by some of the other defendants for transposition of defendant No. 1 as plaintiff No.4 on the ground that defendant No.1 and the plaintiffs have common interest and therefore defendant No.1 will be transposed as plaintiff No.4.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that if some of the defendants have common interest with the plaintiff, then they can be transposed as defendant and therefore the defendant No.1 does not need to be in the array of defendants of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top