SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3250

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Raju Vankhede – Appellant
Versus
Icici Bank Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Rashmendra Suryavanshi[P-1],

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMA

th

ON THE 17 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 5881 of 2026 RAJU VANKHEDE Versus ICICI BANK LTD. AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Rashmendra Suryavanshi - Advocate for the petitioner.

ORDER This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article

226 of the Constitution of India praying for the following reliefs:

"a. That, the instant petition may kindly be allowed and to direct the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.2 to remove the hold/freeze imposed on the Bank account of petitioner;

b. That, the cost of instant petition may also be awarded to the petitioner;

c. Issue such other orders, writ, and direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience in favour of the petitioner."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision rendered by this Court in the case of Malcolm Murayis & Ors. Vs. State Bank of India and Others Malcolm Murayis & Ors. Vs. State Bank of India and Others passed in W.P.

No.1100 of 2024 dated 26.04.2024.

3. So far as the decision rendered in the case of Ma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top