SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3290

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ram – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Mukesh Sinjonia[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE GAJENDRA SINGH

th

ON THE 17 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 11422 of 2025 RAM Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Mukesh Sinjonia - Advocate for the appellant. Shri Rahul Solanki - G.A. for the respondent/State.

Ms. Priyanka Raj Panwar - Advocate for the respondent [COMP].

ORDER This appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 is preferred being aggrieved by the order dated 12.11.2025 in SCATR No.152/2022 by Special Judge, SC/ST (POA) Act, Mandleshwar, Khargone whereby application for release on behalf of appellant in connection with Crime No.268/2022 registered at P.S. Barwah, District Khargone under Section 294, 147, 149, 323, 506, 307, 302, 120B of the IPC and 3(1)(r), 3(4)(s) and 3(2) (v - a) of the SC/ST (POA) Act has been rejected.

2. This is the sixth application of appellant, who is in custody since

15.05.2022 and the main ground for filing this appeal is that there is a delay in trial and the main ground is that the co-accused persons have been released on bail.

3. As per report of P.S. Barwah, Khargone, there are total 22 witnesses have been examined and only t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top