SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3314

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Rev. Naveen Paul Tadge – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Pankaj Chandra Bagadiya,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR ON THE 17TH OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 37825 of 2023 REV. NAVEEN PAUL TADGE Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Pankaj Bagadiya, advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Santosh Singh Thakur, public prosecutor for respondent/State.

…..................................................................................................................

ORDER

This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is filed for setting aside of the order dated 26.6.2023 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ratlam and for quashing of the proceedings and summoning order issued against the petitioner.

2. The exposition of facts, giving rise to present petition, is as under:

a. Jataram Ghosare, Rajesh, Rakesh, Sushila, Kala, Enjalina, Mala, Kusumbai, Rekha Ghosare, Dr. S.R. Dutta, Naveen Tatake and Yohan Chouhan claiming to be employees of Ratlam Christian Hospital filed a written complaint for offence punishable under Section 406 of IPC and Section 7A of The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, inter-alia alleging that they were working at Rat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top