SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3324

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Pushpa – Appellant
Versus
Sumit Narang – Respondent


Advocates:
Yogesh Kumar Mittal,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR ON THE 17TH OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 45335 of 2019 SMT. PUSHPA Versus SUMIT NARANG AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Yogesh Kumar Mittal, advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Rishiraj Trivedi, advocate for respondent No.1.

Shri B.S. Gandhi, advocate for respondent No.2.

…..................................................................................................................

ORDER

This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is filed for quashing of the private complaint and the summoning order dated 13.04.2018 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ujjain regarding registration of complaint for offence punishable under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 120B of IPC.

2. The exposition of facts, in brief, giving rise to present petition, is as under:-

A. Sumit Narang filed a private complaint against Aadarsh Vikram Sahakari Grah Nirman Samiti, Ujjain through its President Yogesh Sharma (respondent No.1), Yogesh Sharma (respondent No.2), Pushpa Maheshwari (respondent No.3) and Shyamsundar Rathi (respondent No.4) inter-alia alleging that the he (complainant Sumit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top