SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3326

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Shushila Patel – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Prasad Patel – Respondent


Advocates:
Vinod Kumar Patel,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RATNESH CHANDRA SINGH BISEN ON THE 17th OF FEBRUARY, 2026 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1330 of 2017 JAGDISH PRASAD PATEL & OTHERS Versus SMT. SUSHILA PATEL & OTHERS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………......................

Appearance Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta– Advocate for the appellants/defendants.

Shri Rupesh Singh Thakur – Advocate for respondents/plaintiffs.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………......................

&

FIRST APPEAL NO. 195 of 2018 SMT. SUSHILA PATEL & OTHERS Versus JAGDISH PRASAD PATEL & OTHERS …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………......................

Appearance Shri Rupesh Singh Thakur– Advocate for the appellants/plaintiffs.

Shri Ashok Kumar Gupta – Advocate for the respondents/defendants.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………......................

Heard on : 15.12.2025

Pronounced on : 17.02.2026

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………......................

JUDGMENT

Both these appeals have been preferred under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Proced

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top