SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3353

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Raju – Appellant
Versus
Mukesh Gurjar – Respondent


Advocates:
Satyendra Singh Rajput,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT SETH WRIT PETITION No. 13560 of 2025 RAJU AND OTHERS Versus MUKESH GURJAR AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri S.S.Rajput - Advocate for the petitioners.

Shri Priyanshu Yadav - Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2.

Shri B.M.Patel - Govt. Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4/State.

Reserved on : 09/02/2026 Delivered on : 16/02/2026 ORDER Heard on the question of admission and final disposal with the consent of parties.

The instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India takes exception to the order dated 18.02.2025 (Annexure-P/1) passed by respondent No.3, whereby the objections raised by the petitioners against the demarcation proceedings dated 06.01.2025 have been rejected and the said demarcation proceedings have been affirmed.

2. Brief facts leading to filing of the present writ petition are as under:

2.1The respondents No.1 and 2 moved an application in terms of Section 129 of the M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 before the Naib Tehsildar, Circle Udaipur, Tehsil Basoda, District Vidisha seeking demarcation of land bearing Survey Nos.145/2 and 141 situated at Village Imaliya. The said application wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top