SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3387

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Devisingh – Respondent
FA 50/2015



Advocates:
Advocate General,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PAVAN KUMAR DWIVEDI

rd

ON THE 3 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 FIRST APPEAL No. 50 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Versus DEVISINGH Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent.

WITH FIRST APPEAL No. 37 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Versus OMPRAKASH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent(s).

FIRST APPEAL No. 38 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Versus RAMBABU AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent(s).

FIRST APPEAL No. 39 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Versus OMPRAKASH Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent.

FIRST APPEAL No. 40 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Versus MANOHARLAL Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent.

FIRST APPEAL No. 41 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Versus DHARMENDRA THR. SAVITRIBAI Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent.

FIRST APPEAL No. 42 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Versus SHIVPRASAD AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent(s).

FIRST APPEAL No. 43 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Versus SHIVNARAYAN Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent.

FIRST APPEAL No. 44 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Versus SATYNARAYAN Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent.

FIRST APPEAL No. 45 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Versus AMBARAM Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent.

FIRST APPEAL No. 46 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Versus DINESH Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent.

FIRST APPEAL No. 47 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Versus SURESH Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent.

FIRST APPEAL No. 48 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Versus AATMARAM AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent(s).

FIRST APPEAL No. 49 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Versus MAKHANSINGH Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent.

FIRST APPEAL No. 63 of 2015 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Versus CHHAGANLAL Appearance:

Shri Dinesh Singh Chouhan, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Shri Somesh Gobhuj, learned counsel for the respondent.

ORDER Looking to the similarity of the dispute involved in the present bunch of appeals, they are being decided by this common order for the sake of convenience.

The facts of the first appeal No.50/2015 are being referred to.

1.1 The State has filed these appeals under the provisions of Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 being aggrieved by the award dated 17.02.2014 passed by the Reference Court in proceedings under Section 18 of the said Act.

2. The relevant facts of the case are that the land belonging to respondent Devi Singh was situated in Survey No.1315

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top