IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JAI KUMAR PILLAI WRIT PETITION No. 11114 of 2012 YOGENDRA VERMA Versus STATE OF M.P. AND ONE ANOTHER Appearance:

Shri Manoj Manav - Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Drishti Rawal –GA for the respondents/State.

Shri Ashutosh Nimgaonkar –Advocate for the respondent No.2.

WITH WRIT PETITION No. 224 of 2018 YOGENDRA VERMA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ONE ANOTHER Appearance:

Shri Manoj Manav - Advocate for the petitioner. Ms.Drishti Rawal –GA for the respondents/State.

Shri Ashutosh Nimgaonkar –Advocate for the respondent No.2.

Reserved on 18.02.2026 Post on 27.02.2026 ____________________________________________________

ORDER

Regard being had to the similitude of the controversy and the commonality of the issues involved, both the writ petitions have been heard analogously and are being decided together by this common order.

WP/11114/2012

2. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner challenging the action and inaction of the respondents whereby the petitioner’s claim for promotion to the post of Assistant Registrar has not been considered. The specific orde