SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3601

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ajay Bhartiya – Appellant
Versus
The State Of M.P – Respondent


Advocates:
Ashok Kumar Shah,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIMANSHU JOSHI

th

ON THE 25 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 35142 of 2021 AJAY BHARTIYA AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF M.P AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Ashok Kumar Shah - Advocate for the petitioners. Smt. Pushpanjaly Dwivedi - Panel Lawyer for the State.

Shri Vivek Agrawal - Advocate respondent No.2.

ORDER The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR vide Crime No.733/2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 294, 323, 34 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act registered at Police Station Budhar District Shahdol.

2. Facts of the case in short are that petitioners are permanent resident of District Dranbad |(Jharkhand) and reputed persons of the society. The petitioner No.1 is husband, whereas the petitioners No.2 & 3 are father-in- law and mother-in-law of the complainant. The allegations against the petitioners are that petitioner along with other co-accused persons were harassing the respondent no.2 for demand of dowery. They were also making pressure on the respondent to give the money deposited i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top