SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3602

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Midiya – Appellant
Versus
Radheshyam – Respondent


Advocates:
Manoj Kumar Mishra,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 25 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. PETITION No. 6223 of 2019 SMT. MIDIYA AND OTHERS Versus RADHESHYAM AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Manoj Kumar Mishra - Advocate for the Petitioner.

Shri Abhayraj Singh Chauhan - Advocate for the Respondents No.1 to

4.

ORDER By way of this Petition, challenge is made to the Order dated

17.05.2019 Annexure P-5 passed by the Additional Commissioner whereby the Additional Commissioner has allowed the appeal against the Order dated 23.02.2018 passed by the S.D.O, and has confirmed the order dated 31.01.2013 passed by the Tahsildar.

2. The matter relates to mutation on the land in question. The Respondent No.1 to 4 had purchased the land from respondent No.5 Ramavtar and thereafter, the disputes as to mutation ensued. There is a registered document in against the Petitioners, and they have been raising the ground that they are also legal representatives of deceased Chenu and the deceased Chenu had erroneously partitioned the land in three portions during his lifetime somewhere in the year 2010 and in terms of the aforesaid erroneous partition, respondent No.5 Ramavtar had err

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top