SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3609

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ritesh Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Suraj – Respondent


Advocates:
Ramesh Prasad Gupta,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH

th

ON THE 25 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. APPEAL No. 3475 of 2018 RITESH SAHU Versus SURAJ AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Ramesh Prasad Gupta - Advocate for the appellant/claimant.

Shri Rajiv Shrivastav-Advocate for respondent No.3/Insurance Company.

ORDER This Miscellaneous appeal under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been filed by appellant-claimant, seeking an enhancement of compensation by challenging the impugned Award dated 09/05/2018, passed by Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Datia (M.P.) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Claims Tribunal') in Claim Case No. 59/2017, whereby Claims Tribunal had awarded compensation of Rs. 4,73,070/-

2. The date of the accident, negligence, and liability are not in dispute. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the compensation awarded by the learned Claims Tribunal is on the lower side. It is contended that on the basis of oral and documentary evidence, it stood proved that the appellant sustained 45% permanent disability due to the accident; however, the Claims Tribunal has assessed the permanent disability at 30% with respect to earnin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top