IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA

th

ON THE 24 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 22288 of 2024 JAGDISH BAGHEL AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Mr. Vijay Dutta Sharma - Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Atul Kumar Sharma - Govt. Advocate for respondent/State.

ORDER Present petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for setting aside order dated 13.05.2024 passed in Sessions Trial No. 250 of 2021 by learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Sabalgarh, District Morena, whereby, the application under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. preferred by the informant party taking alleged medical documents on record was allowed.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that learned trial Court has erred in allowing the application under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. without testing the authenticity and credibility of the said documents so annexed with that application. It is further submitted that even the discharge tickets which have been filed along with the application under Section 91 of Cr.P.C. bears no signature and seal of the concerned doctor and it appears that these documents are manipulated for the reasons best known to the infor