SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3722

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Raj Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
H.K.Shukla,K.K.Shrivastava,Rajeev Shrivastava,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANAND SINGH BAHRAWAT

th

ON THE 24 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 3444 of 2013 RAJ KUMAR YADAV Versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Rajeev Shrivastava - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Prabhat Pateriya - Government Advocate for the respondent/State.

Ms. Prinka Tonk - Advocate for respondent No.3.

ORDER This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed seeking the following reliefs:-

"1. A direction may kindly be given to the respondents to place the answer sheet before this Hon'ble Court to ascertain that despite of having the correct answer in respect of the question nos 26, 31, 32, 44, 46, 59, 76, 77, 79, 81, 82, 95, 97, 98, 99 & 39 the respondents have not given the correct marks for the correct reply of the questions and on account of minus marking they have deducted the 15 marks.

2. Further direction may kindly be given to the respondents to recount the petitioner answer sheet in respect of the abovementioned questions and to add the said marks in the final marks in the selection list;

3. Further direction may kindly be given to the respondents to permit th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top