SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3728

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
The State Of M.P. – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Bhosle & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate General,Amit Verma, Sandeep Ganguly

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR NIRANKARI CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 38 of 1998 THE STATE OF M.P.

Versus SUBHASH BHOSLE AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Pramod Pandey - Government Advocate for the appellant/State.

Shri Amit Verma - Advocate for the respondents.

Heard on :- 21/01/2026 Pronounced on :- 24/02/2026 .......................................................................................................................................................................................

JUDGMENT Per: Justice Ajay Kumar Nirankari The instant criminal appeal has been preferred by the State of M.P.

th against the judgment dated 8/07/1997 passed by the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal (M.P.) in S.T. No.305/1996 whereby the respondents have been acquitted from the charge of Sections 498-A, 304-B and 306 of I.P.C.

2. Complainant Saheb Rao (PW-11) made a written complaint Ex. P-28 to the authority of Police Station Nishantpura, District Bhopal (M.P.) with the allegation that my daughter Ranjana's marriage was solemnized with respondent no.1 Subhash Bhosele on 26/11/1995 with Hindu rituals and customs. Ne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top