SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3779

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Bharatsingh – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish – Respondent


Advocates:
Sachin Parmar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE BINOD KUMAR DWIVEDI

rd

ON THE 23 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. APPEAL No. 631 of 2024 BHARATSINGH Versus JAGDISH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sachin Parmar - Advocate for the appellant.

Shri Manoj Kumar Soni - Advocate for the respondent [R-3].

ORDER This misc. appeal has been filed against the impugned award dated

19.10.2023 passed in MACC No.15/2023 whereby the injured/appellant has awarded an amount of Rs.2,87,000/- alongwith interest which is challenged before this Court.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though proof with regard to the income of the injured was given during trial but learned Claims Tribunal has failed to consider the same and considered the income Rs.7,000/- per month only in para 20 of the award. Whereas even as per the circular issued by the Labour Department under the Minimum Wages Act the income of the unskilled labourers comes to Rs.9,125/- per month therefore, atleast the same should have been considered. On this account, he prays for enhancement of the compensation award.

3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent/Insurance company has opposed the prayer on the ground that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top