SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3869

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Betidevi – Appellant
Versus
Sushila – Respondent


Advocates:
Pavan Kumar Vijaywargiya[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH

th

ON THE 20 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. PETITION No. 5347 of 2025 BETIDEVI AND OTHERS Versus SUSHILA AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Pavan Kumar Vijaywargiya - Advocate for petitioners.

Shri Shashank Indapurkar- Advocate for respondent No.1.

Shri Dileep Awasthi- Govt. Advocate for respondent No.2.

ORDER This Misc. Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by petitioners/plaintiffs assailing the order dated 26th of August, 2025, passed by the Third Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ambah, District Morena, in Regular Civil Suit No. 72-A of 2022, whereby the application filed by petitioners under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act for examination of disputed signatures of respondent No. 1 on the agreement dated 11-07-2019 by a handwriting expert has been rejected.

2. A few facts giving rise to the present petition, as narrated therein, are that petitioners have instituted a civil suit against respondent No. 1 seeking a declaration of rights and permanent injunction, praying that the sale deed dated 11.07.2019 be declared null, void, and inoperative along with consequential reliefs. It was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top