SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3887

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Durga Prasad Soni – Appellant
Versus
Bhojraj Soni – Respondent


Advocates:
Sanjay Kumar Patel,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN

th

ON THE 20 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. PETITION No. 6309 of 2019 DURGA PRASAD SONI Versus BHOJRAJ SONI AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Vineet Mishra - Advocate for petitioner.

Shri Amit Mishra - P.L. for the respondents / State.

Shri Sanjay Kumar Saini- Advocate for respondent No.1 ORDER Shri Vinit Mishra- Advocate appears as proxy counsel and submits that the party has taken away the file from the Office of the counsel and therefore, they have no instructions in the matter.

2. As the trial in the case is held up since 2019, this Court proceeds to hear the case on merits.

3. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated

09.09.2019, whereby the trial Court has directed the plaintiff to pay ad valorem court fees on the basis of value of his share in the property, as the suit is for partition.

4. The suit is for partition and consequential permanent injunction. No relief of possession has been prayed in the suit for partition and so far as the relief of permanent injunction is concerned, the plaintiff has already valued the value for the purpose of permanent injunction as per his wish and paid t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top