SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(MP) 546

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
VIVEK RUSIA, PRADEEP MITTAL, JJ.
M/s Jai Prakash Associated Pvt. Ltd. - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Madhya Pradesh and Others - Respondents
Misc. Petition No. 6937 of 2019
Decided On : 19-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Shri R.S. Jaiswal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anjali Upadhyay.
For the Respondent: Shri Krishana Kumar Gautam.

Stamp duty is determined by the law valid on the date of execution. For mining leases, duty is calculated on the average annual royalty (exclusive of dead rent) and not on the aggregate royalty for the entire lease term.

Headnote:(A) Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 26 and 40 and Article 38(vi) - Registration Act, 1908 - Section 23 - M.P. Stamp Duty Amendment Ordinance, 2014 - Determination of stamp duty on mining lease - Law applicable at the time of execution - Stamp duty is to be determined with reference to the date of execution of the document, and not on the date when the document is impounded or when an order is subsequently passed by the Registrar of Stamps. (Para 18)

(B) Mining Lease - Royalty and Dead Rent - Distinction between royalty and dead rent - In mining leases, the lessee is required to pay either royalty or dead rent, whichever is higher. Both cannot be levied simultaneously on the same lease; hence, calculating annual rent by adding dead rent to royalty is contrary to law. (Paras 22-24)

(C) Calculation of Duty - Under Article 38(vi) of the Schedule, where a lease purports to be for thirty years or more, stamp duty is payable on the average annual rent reserved, and not on the total rent calculated for the entire lease period. (Para 26)

Facts of the case:
An entity was granted a mining lease for extraction of limestone for a period of 30 years. The lease deed was executed and subsequently presented for registration. The Collector determined the deficit stamp duty by adding dead rent to the average annual royalty, multiplying the total by the 30-year lease period, and applying a 5% rate. Additionally, the Collector imposed a penalty and included Upkar. The Board of Revenue dismissed the revision filed against this order.

Findings of Court:
The Collector committed multiple errors: first, by including dead rent along with royalty; second, by applying the duty to the aggregate royalty of the 30-year period instead of the average annual rent reserved; third, by imposing Upkar as the lease did not exceed 30 years; and fourth, by imposing a penalty based on a fundamentally flawed calculation of the deficient duty.

Issues: Whether stamp duty is determined by the law in force at the time of execution or at the time of the order; whether dead rent can be aggregated with royalty for duty calculation; and whether the 5% duty under Article 38(vi) applies to the average annual rent or the total rent for the lease term.

Ratio Decidendi: Stamp duty is governed by the legislation prevailing on the date of the instrument's execution. In mining leases, royalty and dead rent are mutually exclusive for the purpose of payment (whichever is higher), and therefore cannot be combined. Furthermore, the statutory provision for leases of 30 years or more specifically mandates calculation based on the average annual rent reserved, not the total rent for the entire duration of the lease.

Result: Petition allowed; impugned orders set aside; directed to register the lease deed on payment of Rs. 5,29,168/- only, without imposing any penalty or Upkar.

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • revenue law
    • stamp duty
      • mining lease
        • applicable law (Para 18, 19, 20, 21)
        • calculation of stamp duty (Para 2, 3, 24, 26)
        • dead rent and royalty (Para 22, 23, 24)
        • upkar (Para 25)
      • penalty (Para 6, 10, 27)

Table of Contents

1. Challenge to order demanding deficit stamp duty and penalty on mining lease — Calculation under Article 38(vi) of Stamp Act. (Para 1 , 2 )

2. Petitioner: duty on annual royalty only; Respondent: duty on total lease consideration and penalty valid. (Para 3 , 5 , 9 , 10 , 14 , 15 )

3. Petition allowed — Impugned orders set aside — Directed registration on payment of proper stamp duty without penalty. (Para 27 )

4. Which law governs stamp duty on a mining lease executed before an amendment?

The law in force on the date of execution of the lease deed applies, not a later amendment with retrospective effect. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 )

5. How is stamp duty under Article 38(vi) calculated for a mining lease?

Stamp duty is 5% of the average annual rent reserved, not multiplied by the lease term of thirty years. (Para 2 , 3 , 24 , 26 )

6. Can dead rent and royalty be added together for calculating stamp duty on a mining lease?

No, either royalty or dead rent, whichever is higher, is payable. Both cannot be added simultaneously. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 )

7. Is Upkar under the M.P. Upkar Adhiniyam leviable on a mining lease?

No, Upkar is not leviable on a mining lease as it is not a sale or gift deed and the lease period does not exceed 30 years. (Para 25 )

ORDER :

Pradeep Mittal, J.

The petitioner has filed the present Miscellaneous Petition challenging the order dated 29.03.2016 (Annexure P/3) passed by the Collector, whereby the petitioner was directed to pay deficit stamp duty along with a penalty amounting to Rs.2,14,38,712/- (Rs.1,64,38712/- towards deficit stamp duty and Rs.50,00,000/- as penalty). Against the said order, the petitioner preferred a revision before the Board of Revenue, however, the same was dismissed vide order dated 28.01.2019.]

2. The facts of the case are that petitioner Company was granted a mining lease for extraction of limestone over an area of 135.435 hectares situated at Village Karmau, Tehsil Rampur Baghlan, District Rewa (Madhya Pradesh), for a period of 30 years by the State Government of Madhya Pradesh for use in its cement manufacturing plant. A Mining Lease Agreement was executed on 09.10.2014. The petitioner required limestone as captive mining material for manufacturing cement and, due to urgent necessity, executed the agreement on a stamp paper of Rs. 500/-. The petitioner submitted the document before the Sub-Registrar, Rampur Baghelan, on 12.12.2014 for proper determination and payment of stamp duty and for registration. In compliance with Circular No. 1164 dated 21.05.2004 issued by the Inspector General, Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal, the Sub-Registrar, Rampur Baghelan, forwarded the document to the Registrar for correction and determination of stamp duty under Section 38(vi) of the Stamp Act, as amended by the Madhya Pradesh Stamp Duty Amendment Ordinance, 2014, published in the M.P. Gazette dated 16.09.2014 and effective from 16.09.2014. As per Article 38(vi), where a lease purports to be for a period of thirty years or more, or in perpetuity, or does not specify a definite period, stamp duty is payable at five percent (5%) of the amount of premium or money advanced or to be advanced as set forth in the deed, plus the average annual rent reserved, or the market value of the property, whichever is higher. As per the aforesaid provision, stamp duty was payable at 5% of the average annual rent reserved.

3. On 19.01.2015, proceedings were registered by the Collector of Stamps, Satna, under Section 40 read with Article 38(vi) of the Stamp Act. The Collector issued a letter dated 15.01.2015 to the Mining Officer, Satna, seeking information regarding the average annual royalty for the lease area of 135.435 hectares. The Mining Officer, Satna, submitted a report dated 24.01.2015 stating that the average annual royalty, as per the approved mining plan, was Rs. 10583370/-. The Mining Officer also stated that the dead rent at Rs. 1,000/- per hectare per year for five years would amount to Rs. 544000/-. However, it is settled that dead rent cannot be added to royalty, as royalty becomes payable when it exceeds the dead rent, and in such cases, dead rent is not payable separately. Based on the Mining Officer’s report, the stamp duty at 5% of the average annual royalty of Rs. 10583379/- would amount to Rs.529168/-. However, the Collector wrongly added the dead rent and further multiplied the total annual amount by 30 years, determining the duty at 5% on Rs.10692170/- × 30 years, and thereby calculated stamp duty at Rs. 1,64,38,712/- which also included dead rent and cess (Upkar). The said calculation is wholly erroneous. Under Article 38(vi), stamp duty is to be calculated on the average annual rent reserved. Royalty is equivalent to rent as per Section 26 of the Stamp Act, and dead rent cannot be added thereto. Therefore, stamp duty payable should be 5% of Rs.10583370/-, i.e., Rs.529168/- only. The determination of duty on the entire 30-year lease period is illegal and contrary to law. The petitioner filed objections before the Collector of Stamps on 11.04.2016 stating that, as per the mining plan, total production for five years would be Rs.503969/- metric tons, and the average annual production would be 100793.8 metric tons. At the royalty rate of Rs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top