SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 3950

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Mahendra Singh Tomar – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Atul Gupta[P-1],Advocate General[R-1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA

th

ON THE 19 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 43457 of 2025 MAHENDRA SINGH TOMAR Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Atul Gupta with Shri Jitendra Sharma - Advocate for the applicant.

Shri Raj Kumar Shrivastava- Advocate for respondent No.2.

Shri Satendra Singh Sikarwar - PP for the State.

ORDER

1. The present petition under Section 439(2) of the Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant/complainant for cancellation of bail granted to the th respondent No.2/accused vide order dated 08.09.2025 by VI Additional Sessions Judge, Shivpuri.

2. Counsel for the applicant submits that a case was registered against the respondent No.2 at P.S.- Goverdhan, District- Shivpuri for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 324, 294, 506(2), 147, 149, 341, 325, 353, 332 and 186 of IPC because she, being a Sarpanch, with another co-accused person, committed marpeet with the complainant Mahendra Singh Tomar.

The respondent No.2 was granted bail vide order dated 08.09.2025.

3. It is further contended that the order of the trial court granted benefit of anticipatory bail thereby, is a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top