SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4067

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sunil Pal – Appellant
Versus
Gajendra Singh Lodhi – Respondent


Advocates:
Ramesh Prasad Gupta,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIRDESH

th

ON THE 18 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. APPEAL No. 389 of 2018 SUNIL PAL Versus GAJENDRA SINGH LODHI AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Ramesh Prasad Gupta - Advocate for the appellant.

Shri Bal Krishna Agrawal- Advocate for respondent Insurance Company.

Shri Rishikesh Bohare- Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.

ORDER

1. This appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been preferred by the appellant/claimant challenging the award dated 01.11.2017 passed by the 3rd Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, District Gwalior (M.P.) in Claim Case No.1800083/2016, whereby the claim petition filed by the appellant was dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 24.05.2015 at about 7:00 p.m., while the claimant along with his father Komal Pal and Shishupal was waiting for a bus near Narain Purva School, Village Sila Nagar, Police Station Amola, District Shivpuri, a tractor bearing registration No. MP-33-AB-0853 was allegedly driven in a rash and negligent manner and hit them, causing grievous injuries to the claimant. The claimant suffered a head fracture and multiple injuries and was treated at Karera, Shi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top