SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4133

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vipin Kumar Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Manikant Sharma,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B. P. SHARMA

th

ON THE 17 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 6675 of 2017 VIPIN KUMAR AGRAWAL AND OTHERS Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Manikant Sharma - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Sachindra Raghuvanshi - PL for State.

Shri Shivam Sharma - Advocate for respondent No.2.

ORDER The petitioners, being aggrieved by the FIR No.744/2014 registered at Police Station Harda, District Harda, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 294 & 506-B of the IPC, have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashment of the aforesaid FIR and charge-sheet filed in ST No.98/2016, pending before the Court of ADJ Harda (M.P.).

2. The respondent No.2 submitted a complaint to the IG Harda, which was forwarded to the SP Harda. The same was again forwarded to the ASP, then P. S: Harda, and thereafter lodged an FIR against the petitioner. As per the written complaint the complainant was a Director in a Company which is private limited company named as M/s. Nikhil Sugar Limited Harda. He was actively associate on the worki

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top