SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4134

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Pramod Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Vinita – Respondent


Advocates:
Vinay Kumar Sharma,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIMANSHU JOSHI

th

ON THE 17 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 19842 of 2016 PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN Versus SMT. VINITA AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Vinay Kumar Sharma - learned counsel with Shri Gaurav Kumar Patel -

Advocate for the petitioner.

ORDER This petition has been filed by the applicant against the judgment passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sagar dated 26.09.2016 in Criminal Case No.4423/2011, whereby the learned trial Court has acquitted the respondent for the charge under Section 420 of IPC.

2. Aforesaid criminal case was instituted on the basis of private complaint filed by the victim/applicant.

3. The question before this Court is whether instant petition is covered under proviso to Section 413 of BNSS (372 of Cr.P.C.).

4. The aforesaid issue is no longer res integra in light of the judgment of Hon\'ble Apex Court in the case of Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc., 2025 SCC Online SC 1320. The issue arose in said adjudication was whether an appeal would be maintainable under the proviso to Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against an order of acquittal passed in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top