SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4154

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Ram Bahore @ Ramkishore – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate General,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIMANSHU JOSHI

th

ON THE 12 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 46 of 2012 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Versus RAM BAHORE @ RAMKISHORE AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Amit Pandey - Government Advocate for applicant/State.

None for respondent.

ORDER The State has preferred the present application for grant of leave to appeal against the judgment dated 29.01.2010 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST of Atrocities Act), Satna in Special Case No.37/2000, whereby the respondents have been acquitted from the charge of offences under Sections 147, 294, 324/149, 323/149, 506(B) of the IPC and Section 3(i)(x) of the SC/ST Act.

2. The prosecution's case in short is that on 17.06.1999 at about 3 O'clock Badri Lal Patel, Lallu, Rambahore and Sadhu Patel came and told for vacating the land, otherwise they would face serious consequences. At that time, Dayanand and Ramjas came there and tried to intervene then one Mirra Patel, Bala Patel, Lakhan Patel abused the victim and also insulted them. When the victim objected to abuse them, the respondent Mirra assaulted Tangi on the head of Shakuntala (sister-in-law of the complainant)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top