SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4185

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ram Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner – Respondent


Advocates:
Amit Raghuvanshi,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA

nd

ON THE 22 OF JANUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 39801 of 2024 RAM PRAKASH Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sandeep Kumar Mishra - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Aryaditya Singh - Panel Lawyer for the respondents/State.

ORDER This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking following reliefs:-

(i) That, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ in the nature of mandamus to quash the impugned order dated 08-11-2024 passed in case 0985/appeal/2023-24 passed by respondent No.1 (Annexure P-6)

(ii) That, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to confirmed the order dated 9-2-2022 and 26-7-2020 i.e.

Annexure P-3 & P-4.

(iii) Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court deemed fit and proper may also be passed together cost of petition.

2 . It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner had filed an application for mutation before respondent No.3/ Tehsildar pleading that one Biliya Bai has executed a Will in favour of the petitioner with respect to property bearing Khasra Nos.229, 322, 458, 459 total area 4.12 hectare. Out of total area, land

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top