SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11614

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Ghanshyam – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh Thr – Respondent


Advocates:
Dharmendra Nayak,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT SETH WRIT PETITION No. 7887 of 2015 GHANSHYAM Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THR AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Jitendra Singh Rathore - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Prabhat Pateriya - Govt. Advocate for respondents/State.

Shri Ashish Saraswat - Advocate for respondents No.2 & 4.

Reserved on : 12/12/2025 Delivered on : 16/12/2025 ORDER With the consent of parties, the matter is heard finally.

The instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India claims the following reliefs:

"(a) That, the respondent authority may kindly be directed to consider the representation dated 05-11-2015 for grant of compensation on the basis of report dated 12-08-2015 submitted by the authority.

(b) That, the respondents authority may kindly be directed to grant compensation to the petitioner with respect to the constructed house over the survey No.1155 of Village Nohrikalan, District Shivpuri.

(c) That, the other reliefs doing justice including cost be awarded."

2. Subsequently, through amendment permitted vide order dated

03/09/2025, the petitioner had also sought for the quashment of the order dated 02

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top