SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11666

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Neeendfra Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Dharmendra Singh Raghuwanshi,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHISH SHROTI

th

ON THE 15 OF DECEMBER, 2025 WRIT PETITION No. 19004 of 2021 NEEENDFRA SHRIVASTAVA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri M.P.S. Raghuvanshi- Senior Counsel with Shri Manish Gurjar -

Counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Jitesh Sharma- Govt. Advocate for the respondents/State.

ORDER The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order, dated

12.04.2018 (Annexure P/1) whereby punishment of stoppage of two increments without cumulative effect has been imposed upon him on account of certain misconduct found proved. He has also challenged order dated 04.02.2020 (Annexure P/2) whereby his appeal against the aforesaid punishment order was not accepted.

2 . At the relevant time, the petitioner was working as Revenue Inspector and was posted in the office of Tehsildar, Tehsil Shivpuri (M.P.). A show cause notice was issued to the petitioner on 28.03.2018 (Annexure P/3) asking him to give his explanation with regard to allegations made therein. The petitioner submitted his explanation on 02.04.2018 (Annexure P/4) and thereafter the impugned orders came to be passed thereby impo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top