SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11775

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Naman Sharma – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sameer Kumar Shrivastava,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE WRIT PETITION No. 18237 of 2025 NAMAN SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sameer Kumar Shrivastava - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Samar Ghuraiya Dy Ga appearing on behalf of Advocate General.

Shri Anand Purohit, learned counsel for the respondent [R-3].

Reserved on : 11.12.2025 Pronounced on : 16/01/2026 This petition having been heard and reserved for orders, Hon’ble Shri Justice Milind Ramesh Phadke, Judge pronounced the following:

ORDER The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashment of the FIR and the charge sheet registered by Respondent No.2 at the instance of Respondent No.3 for offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 294, 506, 34 of IPC read with Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

2. The prosecution case, as stated in the FIR, is that the complainant (Respondent No.3) was married to the petitioner according to Hindu rites and rituals. After marriage, the petitioner and his family members started harassing the complainant for bringing less dowry. Petitioner an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top