SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11780

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Albel Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate General,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. AHLUWALIA

th

ON THE 11 OF DECEMBER, 2025 FIRST APPEAL No. 666 of 2024 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS Versus ALBEL SINGH AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri G.K. Agrawal, Government Advocate for appellants/State.

ORDER Heard on I.A. No.2595/2024.

2. This is an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act. It is merely mentioned in the application that after the Award was passed, appellants obtained legal opinion and forwarded the matter to the competent Authority and permission was granted by the Law Department on 3/8/2023.

Thus, it is claimed that delay of 415 days may be condoned.

3. In the application for condonation of delay no reasons have been assigned.

4. The Supreme Court in the case of Shankargir Vs. The State of M.P.

and another decided on 5.12.2025 in Civil Appeal No.14613/2025 has referred to the decision in the case of Union of India v. Jahangir Byramji Jeejeebhoy (D) Through His Lr. reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC 489, wherein it has been held as under:-

30. In Postmaster General v. Living Media India Limited, (2012) 3 SCC 563, this Court, while dismissing the application for condonation of del

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top