SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11812

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Shivanand @ Pappu Pandey – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Bhupendra Kumar Shukla,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIMANSHU JOSHI

th

ON THE 9 OF DECEMBER, 2025 MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 3416 of 2025 SHIVANAND @ PAPPU PANDEY Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appearance:

Shri Bhupendra Kumar Shukla - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Amit Garg - P.L. for the respondent/State.

ORDER This petition has been filed invoking inherent powers provided to the High Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C/528 of BNSS for quashing of FIR registered against the petitioner vide Crime No.576/2024 at P.S. Rampur Naikin, District Sidhi (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the M.P. Excise Act and also for further proceedings initiated in pursuance thereto. The quashing of FIR and further proceedings is being prayed on the ground that no offence is made out against the petitioner as no material is available with the prosecution connecting the present petitioner with the alleged crime. The present petitioner has been meticulously added in the crime because it is clear from the available material and also from the language used in the FIR.

2. As per the facts of the case, the story narrated by the prosecution in short is that Sub Inspe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top