SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11841

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt Roopal Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Burman – Respondent


Advocates:
Sushil Giri Goswami,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HIMANSHU JOSHI

rd

ON THE 3 OF DECEMBER, 2025 REVIEW PETITION No. 2257 of 2025 SMT ROOPAL MISHRA AND OTHERS Versus RAJENDRA BURMAN AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Sushil Giri Goswami - Advocate for the appellants.

Shri Vaibhav Jain - Advocate for respondent no.3.

ORDER The instant review petition has been filed seeking recall of the judgment and order dated 14.11.2025 passed in M.A. 3341/2018, whereby the appeal preferred by the claimant for enhancement of compensation was partly allowed and the compensation was enhanced from Rs. 6,10,000/- to Rs. 8,66,000/-.

2. The grievance of the review petitioner is that while deciding the appeal, this Court inadvertently overlooked the Income Tax Return duly exhibited on record, which reflects that the deceased had an annual income of Rs. 1,71,880/- for the assessment year 2012-13, Rs. 2,18,240/- for the assessment year 2013-14 and Rs. 2,18,220/- for the assessment year 2014- 2015 was per annum., filed prior to the accident. It is contended that non- consideration of this material document has resulted in an error apparent error on the face of the record, warranting exercise of r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top