SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4369

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Amit Kumar Kuklod – Appellant
Versus
Directorate Of Enforecement – Respondent


Advocates:
Priyankush Jain,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE B. P. SHARMA

th

ON THE 18 OF MARCH, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 9694 of 2025 M/S JAYSHRI GAYTRI FOOD PRODUCTS PVT LTD.

Versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Appearance:

Shri Anil Khare - Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Priyankush Jain, Shri Shantanoo Saxena, and Shri Ashwin Rastogi - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Vikram Singh - Advocate for the respondent/CBI.

WITH WRIT PETITION No. 11472 of 2025 AMIT KUMAR KUKLOD AND OTHERS Versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORECEMENT Appearance:

Shri Anil Khare - Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Priyankush Jain, Shri Shantanoo Saxena, and Shri Ashwin Rastogi - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Vikram Singh - Advocate for the respondent/CBI.

ORDER As the issue involved in both the petitions is common and identical, they are being heard and decided together by this common order. For the shake of convenience the facts are being taken from Writ Petition No.9694/2025.

The present writ petitions have been instituted invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India, calling in question the legality, validity and propriety of ECIR bearing No. ECIR/BHZO/13/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top