IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL DHAGAT

th

ON THE 18 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 17387 of 2025 RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA Versus MADHYA PRADESH VIDYUT VITRAN CO. LTD AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Satyam Agrawal - Advocate for petitioner.

Shri Aditya Khandekar - Advocate for respondents.

ORDER Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India challenging order dated 28/02/2025 contained in Annexure P-7. By said order prayer of petitioner for encashment of earned leave was rejected on ground that revision filed by petitioner against conviction and sentence is pending before High Court. Prayer for encashment of earned leave was rejected in aid with Rule 64(1)(c) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 on grounds that payment is to be made on conclusion of proceedings. Final retiral benefits are to be paid after adjustment of provisional pension gratuity paid under Rule 64(1)(c) of M.P. Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 on conclusion of proceedings. Proceedings include departmental enquiry or judicial proceedings.

2. Counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that respondents had committed an error in passing