SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 4434

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Nirmala Chouhan – Appellant
Versus
High Court Of M.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Devendra Kumar Tripathi,Advocate General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK RUSIA &

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADEEP MITTAL

th

ON THE 4 OF FEBRUARY, 2026 WRIT PETITION No. 7179 of 2016 NIRMALA CHOUHAN Versus HIGH COURT OF M.P. AND OTHERS Appearance:

Shri Devendra Kumar Tripathi - Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Parag Tiwari, Advocate for respondents.

ORDER Per: Justice Pradeep Mittal By way of this petition, the petitioner challenges the memo dated

17.02.2016, whereby approval for her appointment as Peon has been denied on the ground that she belongs to the Scheduled Tribe category and secured 20 marks in the examination, whereas no post was reserved for woman of the Scheduled Tribe category. It is contended that, petitioner got more marks than the unreserved woman candidate, the petitioner ought to have been considered against an unreserved category post.

2. The facts leading to the present petition are that pursuant to the advertisement for the post of Peon/Chowkidar/Waterman/Gardener the petitioner applied for the post of peon. In the examination she obtained 20 marks. After preparation of select list the petitioner finds place at serial no. 3.

3. It is submitted that the select list

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top