2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 36729
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Ramarao Mudadla – Appellant
Versus
CBI – Respondent
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 14796 of 2026
##PAGE1##
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:43318
1 MCRC-14796-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
AT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJEEV S KALGAONKAR
ON THE 19 OF JUNE, 2026
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE No. 14796 of 2026
RAMARAO MUNDADLA AND OTHERS
Versus
CBI
Appearance:
Ms. Kirti Sharma and Shri Rajendra Kumar Sen - Advocates for the
applicants.
Shri Vikram Singh - Advocate for the respondent.
ORDER
Heard on I.A. No.14132/2026, an application for taking the additional
documents on record.
Considered.
I.A. No.14132/2026 is allowed. The documents are taken on record.
This first application has been filed by applicant under Section 483 of
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of bail in connection with
Crime No.RC0082025A0015 registered at Police Station - CBI ACB, district -
Bhopal for offences punishable under Section 120B read with Section 420 of the
IPC and under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Applicants are
in judicial custody since 16.03.2026.
2. Heard the arguments.
3. Perused the grounds for grant of bail stated in the application, case
diary and the relevant material on record.
4. Learned counsel for the applicants, in addition to the grounds
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: KOUSHALENDRA
SHARAN SHUKLA
Signing time: 22-06-2026
17:42:28
##PAGE2##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:43318
2 MCRC-14796-2026
mentioned in the application, submits that the applicants have been falsely
implicated in this matter. In fact the applicants are victim of fraud committed by
the main accused who induced them to collect money from the candidates to
secure their job. The applicant No.1 - Ramarao Mudadla had forwarded money
received from the candidates to Achyutanand Azad. But when the applicant
demanded remittance of the money from Achyutanand, he threatened the applicant
of falsely implication in the crime in question. Therefore, the applicant Ramarao
submitted written complaint to the DIG, CRPF, Bhopal. So far as the applicant
No.2 - Mudili Janardhana Naidu is concerned, he neither received any amount in
his account nor he induced anyone to give money for securing job. Final report has
been submitted on completion of investigation. The applicant No.1 is working as a
Constable in CRPF. The applicant No.2 is aged about 43 years and doing private
works. The applicants have family to look after. The trial will take considerable
time to conclude. It is further contended that the main accused Achyutanand Azad
has been enlarged on bail by Coordinate Bench vide order dated 06.02.2026
passed in M.Cr.C. No.58832/2025. It is also submitted that the applicant No.1 -
Ramarao Mudadla proposes to deposit an amount of Rs.15 Lacs before the trial
Court to show his bona fide in the transaction. Jail incarceration is causing
hardship to the applicants and their families.
5. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent opposes the application
on the ground of gravity of alleged offence. It is further submitted that complicity
of the applicants in the alleged offences is prima facie made out from the evidence
collected during investigation. Various candidates have specifically mentioned
that the applicant No.1 induced them and received money into his bank account on
false promise of providing them government job. At least 21 candidates were
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: KOUSHALENDRA
SHARAN SHUKLA
Signing time: 22-06-2026
17:42:28
##PAGE3##NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:43318
3 MCRC-14796-2026
defrauded by the applicants. The applicant No.1 received the amount of fraud into
his account and accounts of his near relatives. The applicants may influence poor
candidates who have been defrauded by them in conspiracy with other accused
persons. It is also submitted that Achyutanand Azad was granted bail by
Coordinate Bench of this Court considering the severe illness of his daughter. The
present application is meritless. However, after going through the case diary, he
fairly states that no criminal antecedent is reported against the applicants.
Applicant No.1 is aged 33 years and he