2026 Supreme(Online)(MP) 36881
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
Vivek Jain, J
Imtiaz Husain – Appellant
Versus
Sankalp Kochar – Respondent
CIVIL REVISION No. 503 of 2026
Important Points
Subject
Civil Law - Family Law
Act Referred
Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939
Family Courts Act, 1984: S.7(d)
High Court of Madhya Pradesh Family Court Rules, 1988: R.9
Headnote
(B) Family Courts Act, 1984 - Jurisdiction - Divorce Petitions - Muslim Men’s Right to Seek Divorce - Under Section 7(1)(Explanation)(d) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, and the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Family Court Rules, 1988, Muslim men are entitled to file petitions for the dissolution of marriage before the Family Court; the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939, does not preclude men from accessing judicial forums for divorce. (Para 8)
Issues: Whether a suit for declaration of divorce based on a Fatwa discloses a valid cause of action and whether Muslim men have the right to file divorce petitions in Family Court.
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Imtiaz Husain, Afshan Ahmad
For the Respondents: Sankalp Kochar, Pramendra Singh Thakur
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the rejection of application under order 7 rule 11 cpc regarding a divorce suit based on a fatwa. (Para 1 , 2) |
The present revision has been filed challenging the order dated
11.04.2026 passed by the Family Court thereby rejecting the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The application was filed for rejecting the
petition filed for declaration of divorce before the Family Court.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant-wife has submitted that the respondent-husband has filed a suit before the Family Court whereby declaration of divorce has been sought on the assertion that there is a Fatwa issued by Darul-Ifta Masajid Committee, Bhopal on 22.10.2024 and in terms of the aforesaid Fatwa the declaration of dissolution of marriage be granted. It is argued that such Darul dafa Masjid Committee Bhopal has no authority to grant divorce and therefore no declaration can be granted on such Fatwa
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: NAVEEN KUMAR
SARATHE
Signing time: 05-08-2026
16:31:51
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:58928
2 CR-503-2026 of the said seminary. By relying on the aforesaid Fatwa (Annexure P-4) it is argued that the said Fatwa only mentions from Islamic texts that in what circumstances divorce can be sought and this Fatwa only mentions what the Islamic scriptures provide in such situation and this is not a divorce granted by the said seminary and no declaration can be sought on the basis of such
Fatwa.
3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent has vehemently argued that the suit is maintainable and also that there is a prayer made in the plaint of declaration of divorce and otherwise also a divorce petition is
maintainable.
4. This Court has heard learned counsel for the rival parties at length.
5. In the application filed before the Family Court under Order 7 Rule
11 CPC something different has been stated by the present applicant-wife and it has been stated therein that the suit has been filed under Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 and under the said provision only females have a right to seek divorce and Muslim men have no right to seek divorce. However, at the time of hearing of the present revision a different point has
been argued that the suit for declaration of divorce is not maintainable. 6. This Court has gone through the plaint and in the plaint indeed it is
found that suit has been filed for declaration of divorce and relief has been sought that on the basis of Fatwa dated 29.10.2024, the decree of declaration
of divorce be granted.
7. This Court has gone through the said Fatwa and the said Fatwa nowhere mentions divorce to be granted and indeed any seminary cannot
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: NAVEEN KUMAR
SARATHE
Signing time: 05-08-2026
16:31:51
NEUTRAL CITATION NO. 2026:MPHC-JBP:58928
3 CR-503-2026 grant any divorce to a Muslim male. The said Fatwa only mentions the provisions in the Islamic scriptures which give guidance in such situation when there is cruel conduct of the wife which was queried by the present
applicant to the Darul-dafa Masajid Committee, Bhopal.
8. So far as the maintainability of suit for divorce is concerned, the question is no longer res integra. It has been held by a Division Bench of this Court in F.A. No.1199 of 2022 that the divorce petitions are maintainable and by interpretation of Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939, it cannot be said that Muslim men cannot file petitions for divorce. The Division Bench in the aforesaid case has interpreted Section 7(d) of Family
Courts Act, 1984. The Division Bench held as under:
"10. Section 7 of the Act of 1984 falls under Chapter III which contemplates jurisdiction. Section 7(1)(Explanation)(d) of Act of 1984 contemplates that a suit proceeding which can be entertained by Family Court if the said suit or proceeding is for an order or injunction in circumstances arising out of a marital relationship. Since this provision does not distinguish on the basis of Caste and Community, therefore, it is all pervasive in n