SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 2110

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SARABJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
ESTATAE OFFICER PUDA – Respondent


ORDER

Petitioner purchased a shop-cum-office site in an open auction on 10.4.2001 for Rs.45,80,000/-. 25% of the auction money was deposited on the spot. Remaining amount was to be paid in 4 equal instalments along with interest. On inspection, the petitioner found that there was a heavy- duty electricity transformer installed at the backside of the allotted SCO. Petitioner requested the respondent to remove the transformer and for delivery of possession. Legal Notice was issued on

20.3.2003. Since no relief was given, the petitioner filed the complaint on 6.2.2006.

Respondent, on being served, filed its written statement. The District Forum allowed the complaint and directed the respondent to treat the date of delivery of possession as on 22.8.2007 and quashed the demand of Rs.12,93,125/- raised by the respondent towards penalty-cum- construction charges, etc. because possession had not been delivered till 22.8.2007. It was ordered that penal interest, if any, could be charged from the respondent after 22.8.2007.

Respondent, being aggrieved, filed the appeal before the State Commission, which has been allowed. State Commission has set aside the order of the District Forum on the groun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top