ORDER

Along with present revision petition, an application seeking condonation of delay has been filed.

However, in the entire application no period of delay has been mentioned.

Be that as it may, arguments on application for condonation of delay heard.

Order after lunch.

ORDER (After Lunch)

Petitioner/Opposite Party No.2 has filed the present revision petition against order dated 29.04.2014, passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra, Circuit Bench at Aurangabad (for short, ‘State Commission’). Along with this petition, an application seeking condonation of delay has been filed, in which no period of delay has been mentioned.

2. Respondent No.1/Complainant had filed a Consumer Complaint against the Petitioner besides others, being manufacturer of the defective Colour Doppler Ultra Sound Scanner, which was purchased from Respondent No.3/Opposite Party no.3.

Therefore, alleging deficiency in service on their part, respondent no.1 filed the consumer complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jalgaon (for short, ‘District Forum’).

3. Petitioner contested the consumer complaint.

4. The District Forum vide order dated 30.04.2005, partly allowed the c