SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(NCDRC) 479

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Shri VARINDER SINGH BHATIA – Appellant
Versus
GURU HARKISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL & 4 ORS. – Respondent


ORDER

This consumer complaint has been filed on 20.12.2013 seeking compensation to the tune of Rs.5.00 crores in relation to alleged deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties cause death of the daughter of the complainant on 21.12.2000. An application under section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 has been moved alongwith complaint seeking exclusion of the time consumed in prosecution of the criminal complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties for computing the period of limitation. Learned counsel for the complainant has contended that although cause of action for filing the consumer complaint arose on 20.12.2000, the complainant as advised had lodged a separate complaint under section 304A IPC against the opposite parties and he was diligently pursuing the matter for the last more than 13 years. Therefore, in view of section 14 of the Limitation Act, for the purpose of computing the period of limitation, the time consumed in the aforesaid criminal proceedings has to be included while computing the period of limitation for filing of the consumer complaint.

2. In order to appreciate the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner, it would be us

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top