Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MRS. JUSTICE SAROJ YADAV, MR. BINOY KUMAR, JJ
SUNIL KUMAR MOHAL & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
M/S. BRIGHT BUILDTECH PVT. LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction and filing of complaint (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. booking details and issues faced (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. opposite party's objections and claims (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. evidence and procedural matters (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. court's observations on consumer status (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. misrepresentation and unfair trade practices (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. order for refund and compensation (Para 14) |
ORDER
PER MRS. JUSTICE SAROJ YADAV, MEMBER
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, the Act) by Mr. Sunil Kumar Mohal and Savita Mohal (hereinafter referred to as the Complainants) against M/S Bright Buildtech Private Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Opposite Party/Builder), seeking refund of amount paid by the Complainants towards purchase of Unit along with interest, compensation and other reliefs.
2. The Complainants had initially filed the present complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as District Forum), however, due to a change in pecuniary jurisdiction, following the judgment of this Commission in Ambrish Kumar Shukla & Ors. vs. Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
