Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
A.P. Sahi, PRESIDENT, Inder Jit Singh, MEMBER
Mayank Selhi – Appellant
Versus
Saya Homes Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court examined initial appeal process including delay and grounds for compensation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellants argued against flat penalty rates compared to established slab structure. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court noted inadequacies in the state commission's rationale for delay compensation. (Para 12 , 19) |
| 4. highlighted the unjust nature of compensation rates and clarified that established agreements must be honored. (Para 14 , 24) |
| 5. verdict issued adjusting compensation while recognizing rightful claim for delayed possession. (Para 20 , 25) |
ORDER
JUSTICE A.P. SAHI, PRESIDENT
1. This appeal was entertained on 11.08.2023, when the delay was condoned and the notices were issued. The order passed on 11.08.2023, records the issues raised in the appeal and is accordingly extracted herein under:
“Heard Mr. Tanay Ayde, learned Counsel for the Appellant. There is a stated delay of 19 days but the Registry has reported that there is a delay of 27 days.
Be that as it may, keeping in view the issues raised and even otherwise cause shown is sufficient and therefore deserves to be condoned, subject to the objection by the other side.
The contention raised is just two-fold. The State Com
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
