Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AVM J. Rajendra AVSM VSM (RETD.), PRESIDING MEMBER, Mr. Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, MEMBER
Tilak Raj – Appellant
Versus
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims should be accompanied by immediate reporting of theft to authorities. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. delays in notification to insurers can affect claim outcomes. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. judicial analysis of prior cases establishes obligations of notification. (Para 8 , 10 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. failure to notify promptly may not invalidate a genuine claim. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. final ruling overrides previous dismissal of complaint. (Para 16 , 17) |
ORDER
1.Revision petition preferred on behalf of the Petitioner / Complainant assails Order dated 18.09.2018 passed by learned State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab (hereinafter referred to as the ‘State Commission’) in FA No. 275 of 2018, whereby the Order passed by the Ld. District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Patiala (hereinafter referred to as the ‘District Forum’) dismissing the complaint, filed by the complainant, was affirmed.
2. Petitioner and the Respondents are hereinafter referred to as the ‘Complainant and Opposite parties’ as appearing in the complaint preferred before the District Forum, for sake of convenience.
3. Factual matrix as noticed in the impugned Order may be briefly referred. Complainant is the re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
