NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. INDER JIT SINGH, PJ, DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, M
SUDHESCHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
MADAT ALI NOOR MOHAMMAD GILANI & ANR. – Respondent
ORDER
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Challenge is to order dated 01.10.2021 of the State Commission in EA/9/2019 in CC/20/2016, vide which an application filed by the Appellant herein was dismissed. The Appellant herein has filed an application dated 06.07.2021 before the State Commission praying for substitution of his name on the ground that he is no more the Director of the JD Company M/s.
Ramnath Developers Private Limited. Following prayers were made in the said application:
“PRAYER: It is therefore most humbly prayed to this Hon’ble Commission to:
a) Discharge and substitute the applicant – Mr. Sudeshchandra Gupta from the present proceeding as person representing the OP/Accused in the present matter;
b) Substitute name of accused/OP – Mr. Sudeshchandra Gupta in the present proceeding with the name of newly appointed IRP as acting director of the OP – Company.
Or in the alternative
b) In alternate- stay the present proceeding sine-die till the completion of entire Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process before the National Company Law Tribunal in Company petition (IB) No. 451/ALD/2019;
c) Pass any such order as this Hon’ble commission may deem fit in favour of the OP’s/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.