Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AVM J. RAJENDRA AVSM VSM (Retd), PRESIDING MEMBER, MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, MEMBER
M/s Mayank Multiplex Pvt Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sh Amit Kumar Ghosh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of tenant's complaint and agreement details. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding obligations and consumer status. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's analysis of obligations and consumer definition. (Para 10 , 12 , 15) |
| 4. legal interpretation of consumer status and property identification. (Para 14 , 18 , 20) |
| 5. final ruling and dismissal of the revision petition. (Para 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT
AVM J. RAJENDRA AVSM VSM (Retd), PRESIDING MEMBER
1. This Revision Petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (the “Act”) against the West Bengal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (State Commission) Order dated 07.02.2019 FA No. 1050/2017 which allowed the Appeal of the Complainant and set aside the Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum Kolkata-III (South) („District Forum‟) order dated 30.08.2017 in CC No. 493/2016.
2. For the convenience, the parties are referred to as placed in the original Complaint filed before the District Forum.
3. Brief facts of the case, as per the Complainants are that they were tenants of premises No.1, Andul Raj Road, PS-Tollygunge, Kolakata- 700026, under the joint owners namely Smt. Latika Mitra and Sri Amit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
