Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AVM J. RAJENDRA, AVSM VSM (Retd.), MEMBER, SUBHASH CHANDRA, PRESIDING MEMBER
M/s IDMC LTD. – Appellant
Versus
M/S ERNST & YOUNG LLP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing details of the consumer complaint under the act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of alleged deficiencies by the opposite parties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's assessment of the complaint's legitimacy. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. nature of the transaction impacting 'consumer' classification. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. recognition of the dismissal of the complaint. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT
AVM J. RAJENDRA, AVSM VSM (Retd.), MEMBER
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21 (a)(i)of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the Act”) against the Opposite Party seeking to direct the OPs:
(i) Allow the instant Complaint filed by the Complainant.;
(ii)Pass an order holding the Opposite Parties 1 to 4 jointly and severally liable for the deficiency in providing service to the Complainant;
(iii)Pass an order directing the OPs to jointly and/ or severally forthwith remit to the Complainant a sum of Rs. 1,59,55,000/- towards the refund of the amount paid by the Complainant to the OPs;
(iv) Pass an order directing the OPs to jointly and/ or severally forthwith remit to the Complainant a sum of Rs. 1,00,00,000 towards compensation for the grave inconvenience and agony
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
