Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
DR. INDER JIT SINGH, PRESIDING MEMBER, DR. SADHNA SHANKER, MEMBER
M/S. SAMAR ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
RAJEEV SHAHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal executions challenge orders against non-compliance. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. emphasis on procedural errors in original orders. (Para 4 , 8) |
| 3. court's requirement for due process in enforcement. (Para 5 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. setting aside of orders allows for reconsideration based on correct procedures. (Para 6 , 7 , 12) |
ORDER
DR. INDER SINGH, PRESIDING MEMBER
1. These 8 Appeal Executions have been filed challenging the orders of the Haryana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as State Commission) in various Execution Petitions as detailed below:
| Sr.No. | Appeal Execution No. | EA No. before State Commission |
| 1. | AE/144/2023 | EA/6/2020 in CC/240/2016 |
| 2. | AE/145/2023 | EA/6/2020 in CC/240/2016 |
| 3. | AE/146/2023 | EA/48/2019 in CC/61/2017 |
| 4. | AE/147/2023 | EA/48/2019 in CC/61/2017 |
| 5. | AE/148/2023 | EA/13/2019 in CC/392/2016 |
| 6. | AE/149/2023 | EA/13/2019 in CC/392/2016 |
| 7. | AE/150/2023 | EA/20/2020 in CC/170/2017 |
| 8. | AE/151/2023 | EA/20/2020 in CC/170/2017 |
2. As these AEs have been filed against similar orders of the State Commission and issues involved are same, hence these are taken up together.
3. Four Consumer Complaints as per following details were filed and decided by the State Commission
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
