Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
AVM J. RAJENDRA, AVSM VSM (Retd.), MEMBER
M/s. SMV Agencies Pvt. Ltd., Sh. Surya Kant Jaipuria, Sh. Raj Kumar Ramrakhiyani, Sh. Chaitanya Jaipuria, Smt. Shreepriya Jaipuria, Sh. Vaibhav Jaipuria – Appellant
Versus
Jaipuria Sunrise Greens Apartments Owners Welfare Association – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the appeals arise from disputes over a residential project and alleged deficiencies in service. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. contentions regarding compliance and jurisdiction challenges are central to the appeals. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. arguments presented concerning locus standi and pecuniary jurisdiction deem important for the determination of the case. (Para 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. findings confirm that aggregate values govern jurisdiction determination, sustaining the consumer protection act's intent. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. conclusion is reached to dismiss the appeal, allowing for liberty to pursue grievances elsewhere. (Para 16 , 18) |
JUDGMENT
AVM J. RAJENDRA, AVSM VSM (Retd.), MEMBER
1. FA No. 376/2022 has been filed by Opposite Parties (OPs) under Section 51 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 ("the Act"), challenging the Order dated 18.06.2021 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab ("State Commission") in CC No. 01 of 2021, wherein the State Commission partly allowed the complaint. FA No. 387 of 2022 has been filed by OPs under Section 58 (1)(b) of the Act, 2019 is against the Order dated 02.05.2022 passed by the State Commission in Execution Application No. 158
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
