ORDER

This review application has been moved by the opposite parties 6 to 8 contending that the order dated 30th April, 2025 deserves to be reviewed as certain facts vital to the adjudication have been omitted to be considered regarding the fixing of joint and several liability under the impugned order.

It is stated that the applicants do not propose to seek rehearing on merits and restricting the review application on the aspect of their liability, and are that they reserve their right to file appropriate proceedings before the Supreme Court in respect of the merits of the order. It is also stated that the applicants alongwith opposite party No.5 had retired from the opposite party No.2 - partnership firm and therefore there could not be any succession of liability in the wake of the retirements.

To support the said contentions the partnership deeds have been referred to.

At the outset it is admitted in paragraph-25 of the review application that the applicants were proceeded ex-parte vide orders dated 23.05.2014, 02.01.2015 and 29.08.2016. The opposite party No.5 - Late Vishandas Parwani had been given the opportunity to join the subsequent proceedings.

I Not only this, thereafter, as