Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
Saroj Yadav, J, Binoy Kumar, P
Lt. Sh. Vikram Singh since dead (through legal representatives) – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Aman Devcon LLP & Anr. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consumer complaint for refund due to delays. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. claims for compensation and injunctions by complainants. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. opposite parties assertion of compliance and counterarguments. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. issues of non-compliance with rera and legal requirements. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. court's directive for relief due to deficiencies in service. (Para 19 , 20) |
ORDER
PER MRS. JUSTICE SAROJ YADAV, MEMBER
1. The present Consumer Complaint has been filed under Section 21 (a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short, the Act) by Lt. Sh. Vikram Singh Through LRs (hereinafter referred to as the Complainants) against M/s. Aman Devcon LLP (hereinafter referred to as Opposite Party No. 1) & its designated partner Mr. Milan Poddar (hereinafter referred to as the Opposite Party No. 2), seeking refund of the total amount paid towards purchase of Unit, along with interest, compensation and other reliefs.
2. The brief facts leading up to the present Complaint are that Late Lt. Vikram Singh entered into a Sale Agreement dated 21.05.2014 with the Opposite Parties for the purchase of Residential Flat No. 801, 8A & 8B on the basement/ground floor of the La
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
